Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 16 of about 17 (some duplicates have been removed)
name is karin woods. i worked on the blue greenway project for six years with the neighborhood parks council, which is now the parks alliance. this is a really good step forward to get this grant because while the port has done a tremendous job of creating parks along the blue greenway, there are gaps. this will help determine whether there are any environmentally challenged areas of the southeast waterfront could be included in the blue greenway. i urge your support, thank you. >> thank you. are there other members of the public who wish to speak on item number two? seeing none, public comment is closed. to the gentleman requesting more information we want to absolutely make sure we are providing as much detail as possible from the documents we have been provided. the 400,000 is a grant provided by a different entity. we are receiving the dollars, not budgeting it from the fund. it is a grant received and allocated from the usepa. they are the folks who actually do determine the level of funding that is necessary for -- or that they are giving per each grant. the grant would be able
. >> good afternoon, i'm karin woods, an alternate to pier 30, 32cac and water front activist many years. i'm not here to talk about whether or not the arena should be on 30, 32. i want to join katy and other members of the cac to talk about the process. the conceptual framework informed the fiscal feasibility study, which will in turn inform the term sheet. what we were hoping was that we could slow the process down enough so we could ask the questions we've got, we have a lot, before we get too deeply into a fixed program so we could ask the questions before the city spends a lot, or the warriors spend a lot of money on the eir and entitlement process. we appreciate the fact the scoping meeting has been moved to mid-january and the port approved moving the term sheets to later on. the issue is to give the cac the opportunity to address the actually issues not on a nimby and cheerleader basis but on the fact of the deal. we will appreciate your help getting there, thank you. >> thank you. may call a few more names. ramon hernandez, rosenthal, rhene, tony. >> i'm ron miguel i'm a member of
as possible. thank you. >> thank you. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is karin woods. i am co-chair of the port central waterfront advisory group which started out more than ten years ago as the pier 70 advisory group when we were struggling to figure out how to keep these fabulous buildings from falling down. it's been a long process. we're very excited about the proposal that orton's brought to the table. we urge you strongly to move this forward so that they can get to work. it's actually quite strange to see these guys here in suits because usually they've got their sleeves rolled up, they're wearing their hard hats. they really want to get started because these buildings are very, very vulnerable. and we urge you to move this forward as soon as possible so they can get to work. thank you. >> thank you. are there other speakers who wish to speak on item number 7? seeing none, public comment is closed. just a question to our city attorney with regards to the resolved clauses that would be added. would that require continuing this? >> it would not, those are nonsubstantive m
Search Results 0 to 16 of about 17 (some duplicates have been removed)